Quick Overview
- The federal courts operate under a presumption of public access - rooted in the First Amendment, the common law right of access to judicial records, and federal statutes.
- Each requires working through the court system, typically with the assistance of an attorney.
- If you have obtained a court order sealing or expunging your federal record, there are specific steps required to have that order reflected in PACER.
On this page 6 sections
PACER is operated by the US federal judiciary, and it is the advanced category: removal there often needs deeper analysis and may still be possible through sealing, redaction, or de-indexing. Records in PACER are removed, sealed, or restricted by order of a federal judge rather than through a privacy request form, which is the nature of the federal public records system. Learn more about background check reports on our blog.
How PACER Records Can Be Changed
The federal courts operate under a presumption of public access - rooted in the First Amendment, the common law right of access to judicial records, and federal statutes. This presumption exists because open courts are a cornerstone of democratic accountability: the public and press have the right to know how federal courts exercise their authority. For more information, visit the US Courts.
As a result, PACER does not use an individual request form for removing records, and the route to change a record runs through the court that holds it. The record belongs to the court rather than to the parties, so the request is built around the court's own process: a sealing, redaction, or other order that the clerk then implements.
What appears in PACER is altered through the court itself - either by a judge's order or through specific procedural mechanisms. That is a legal process rather than an online form, and a free review shows which mechanism fits your record.
Many people assume that because commercial legal databases have removal processes, PACER works the same way. It runs on a different framework: PACER and commercial sites like PACERMonitor or CourtListener operate under entirely different rules, which is why each gets its own strategy. This is one of the most important distinctions in federal court record privacy.
What CAN Be Done: Legal Paths That Exist
Several legal mechanisms can restrict access to federal court records - either eliminating or significantly limiting what appears in PACER. Each works through the court system, typically with the assistance of an attorney. For more information, visit the Privacy Act of 1974.
Sealing
A motion to seal asks the court to restrict public access to specific documents or the entire case docket. Courts weigh the public interest in access against the privacy interest asserted. Sealing is most commonly granted for sensitive personal information, trade secrets, minor children's identities, or cases where public access would cause compelling harm.
Expungement
Federal expungement works differently from state systems and runs through specific federal statutes. Some federal statutes authorize expungement in specific circumstances - juvenile records, first-time drug offenses under certain programs, and cases of factual innocence. Federal courts' expungement authority comes from those statutes rather than a general rule for adult criminal convictions, so the question is whether one of them applies to your situation.
Personal Info Redaction
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 requires redaction of certain sensitive identifiers from court filings: full Social Security numbers, full financial account numbers, full dates of birth, minor children's full names, and home addresses in criminal cases. If filed documents in your case violated these rules, a motion to redact may be available.
Motion to Seal Specific Documents
Even if the overall case docket remains public, a motion to seal specific documents - such as medical records, financial statements, or other sensitive exhibits - can remove targeted sensitive content from public view while leaving the broader case docket intact.
All of the above paths involve filing motions with the federal court and obtaining a judge's order, so an attorney is part of the plan. Working with legal counsel is the best way to put a federal sealing or expungement request on solid footing.
Step-by-Step: Using a Court Order with PACER
If you have obtained a court order sealing or expunging your federal record, there are specific steps required to have that order reflected in PACER. Receiving the order is not enough - it must be processed through the court's clerk's office.
-
1Obtain a certified copy of your sealing or expungement order. Request this from the clerk of the federal court that issued the order. Keep multiple certified copies - you will need them for both PACER and third-party platforms.
-
2Submit the order to the clerk of court. The clerk's office of the court where your case was filed is responsible for updating the PACER docket to reflect the sealing or expungement order. Contact the clerk's office directly to confirm their process for implementing the order.
-
3Follow up on implementation timing. Court clerk's offices can take several weeks to process sealing orders and update PACER records. Follow up to confirm the record has been sealed or restricted as ordered.
-
4Verify the PACER update. After the clerk has processed the order, check PACER directly to confirm that the case docket reflects the restricted access status. If the docket still appears publicly, contact the clerk's office again.
-
5Address third-party sites separately. After PACER is updated, submit removal requests to PACERMonitor, CourtListener, Justia, UniCourt, DocketBird, and any other third-party platforms that mirrored the data before the sealing order. These sites do not update automatically, so each one gets its own documented request.
-
6Request Google de-indexing. After third-party sites remove the content, use Google's tools to request de-indexing of any pages that appeared in search results. Pages removed from their source can linger in Google's cache, so a direct removal request clears them out.
PACER vs. Third-Party Sites: A Critical Distinction
Many people searching for PACER removal are actually most concerned about what appears on Google when someone searches their name - and for most people, the Google results are driven by third-party commercial sites, not by direct access to PACER.gov itself.
The practical distinction is this:
- PACER.gov: The official federal court system. Access is restricted through a court order. Accessed directly by attorneys, legal researchers, and journalists via paid subscription.
- PACERMonitor: A commercial service mirroring PACER data. Can receive privacy requests. Accessible without PACER subscription.
- CourtListener: A non-profit legal database aggregating PACER and state court data. Has a removal request process.
- Justia: A commercial legal database publishing PACER data. Has privacy request channels.
- UniCourt: A legal analytics company aggregating PACER and state court data. Has a privacy request process at privacy@unicourt.com.
- DocketBird: A commercial PACER aggregator. Can receive privacy requests.
If someone finds your federal case by Googling your name, they almost certainly found it via one of the third-party sites above - not by directly accessing PACER. This means addressing the third-party sites and Google is often the highest-impact action you can take, even while pursuing formal legal process for PACER itself.
For most individuals, the privacy harm from a federal case showing up online is driven by third-party commercial aggregators and Google, not by direct access to PACER. Addressing those platforms can significantly reduce your online exposure even before any court order is obtained.
Google De-Indexing of PACER Pages
PACER.gov pages themselves are sometimes indexed by Google - particularly for high-profile cases or cases with a lot of public interest. Google de-indexing of actual PACER.gov pages may be possible when specific circumstances line up, and it is a more advanced request than de-indexing third-party sites.
The circumstances where Google de-indexing of PACER.gov pages may be possible:
- The case has been sealed by court order and the PACER page now returns a restricted access notice
- The PACER page contains personal information that qualifies under Google's Personal Information Removal criteria - particularly if it includes home addresses, Social Security numbers, or information about minors
- The page was indexed at a time when the content was accessible but subsequent court action has restricted it
In many situations, Google de-indexing efforts have the most reach when directed at the commercial third-party sites that republish the same data, where removal from the source and then from Google is achievable. PACER.gov pages are generally treated by Google as authoritative government content, which is why those requests need deeper analysis.
PACER is a government system, and Google generally treats government websites with deference, so a PACER.gov de-indexing request is built around the specific circumstances above. Start with the third-party commercial sites, which are more accessible for removal and more likely to be what Google is actually serving in search results for your name, and add PACER.gov de-indexing where the circumstances fit.
Working with Professionals on PACER-Related Privacy
Addressing a federal case in PACER involves two distinct tracks that require different types of expertise:
Track 1 - The legal process track: Pursuing sealing, expungement, or FRCP 5.2 redaction through the federal court system. This requires a licensed attorney who practices in the relevant federal district. Motions in federal court are filed by licensed counsel, and the removal service runs alongside that work.
Track 2 - The online presence track: Identifying and addressing every commercial website currently displaying your federal case, managing Google de-indexing, and suppressing remaining results. This is where a professional removal service adds significant value.
These two tracks often run in parallel. While an attorney pursues the court-side process, a removal service can be simultaneously working to remove the case from PACERMonitor, CourtListener, Justia, UniCourt, background check sites, and Google - reducing your online exposure right now, while the legal process works toward a more complete solution.
We help identify whether removal may be possible from the third-party sites currently displaying your federal case - and we coordinate with the Google de-indexing process throughout. Our review is free and there is no upfront cost.
For federal cases in PACER, the most effective strategy combines legal counsel pursuing court-side sealing or expungement with a professional removal service simultaneously addressing every third-party platform currently publishing the data. Both tracks move forward at the same time - you do not have to wait for a court order to start reducing your online exposure.
"Transparent, specific, and honest from day one. They told me which records were removable and which weren't before I paid anything."
Is your PACER listing removable from search? Find out - free.
Tell us about your situation and a removal specialist will personally review it and respond within one business day. No pressure, no obligation.
- No upfront payment - you only pay if we succeed
- A+ BBB Rated · 5,000+ Cases Handled · Since 2013
- 100% Confidential · Response within 1 business day
